A Reuters article today discussed
the potential for monopoly in the Grecian aeronautical industry following the
merger of two large airlines, Olympic Air and Aegean Airlines. If my
description of the transaction ended there, perhaps the merger sounds like a
dangerous economic move that should be resisted by the government. And to an
extent, it was; the government in Greece has made several attempts in the past
few years to curb the newly monopolistic Aegean Air from dominating the
industry. And while some of these sanctions were passed, the merger eventually
went through. Why? Most importantly, Greece needs the business. Greece’s
well-documented debt has required the bailout of international institutions in
order to stave off insolvency, a move that many questioned (especially those in
Germany who have worked hard to create a thriving economy in the wake of
post-WWII sanctions of its own).
Because of this desperation, because Greece needs all the help it can
get, monopolies are, for the moment, an acceptable form of industry because
they foster at least some economic activity.
Perhaps I’m stretching the
comparison, but I was annoyed a little by Joseph Stiglitz’s commentary on the
need for new debt regulations between developing and developed nations. He
insists that “money should flow from rich countries to poor, but partly because
debt repayments have become so large in some years the flow of funds has been
moving in the opposite direction” (212). This clearcut assumption is certainly
true in some instances, but the episode with Grecian monopolies provides a
necessary caveat that international economic relations are not nearly as
obvious as Stiglitz would like to portray. Suggesting that poor developing
countries are “often” unnecessarily blamed for their economic instability seems
to me too general to apply to even most cases. For instance, another Reuters
article from today talks about Poland’s recent economic successes as they try
to garner support for a bid to join the EU. The article references political turmoil
in Venezuela as reason for slow growth, while in the Middle East the Arab
Spring developments last year meant a decrease in investments coming into the
country. Stiglitz attributes developing countries’ poverty to their constant
attempt to pay off their debts, and yet this purely economic solution ignores
the political circumstances that shape economic policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment