Wednesday, September 12, 2012

What is the greatest challenge facing the leading actors in the international political economy in the 21st Century? (Timed Essay)



Martin Wolf in his work “why globalization works” defines globalization as a “movement in the direction of greater integration” (15). Wolf vehemently supports the concept of liberal market economies and global economic integration while acknowledging that “a necessary consequence…is the increased impact of economic changes in one part of the world on what happens in the others” (15). With globalization, countries are more and more dependent on the economic activities of nations far outside their borders. The expected benefits of these relationships are obvious--not only does the increase in trade allow for growth in each country's market economy, but it also spurs domestic competition and spreads innovative international technology. Wolf views even the classic criticism of liberal trade (that it benefits the productive economies of developed countries while taking advantage of developing nations) as an advantage to the global economic efficiency, for it provides the highest possible productivity. What Wolf does not touch on, however, is the danger that lies with nations' interdependency in terms of capital. Without checks on the rate at which globalization inevitably multiplies, an economic downturn experienced by one nation will have devastating effects across the globe.

Nowhere can the danger of interdependent market economies be seen more clearly than with the debt crisis in Greece. The creation of the Eurozone allowed for a fluid trade environment within the European Union, but as Greece threatens to default on its loans, all of the countries in the Union suffer from the decreasing value of the Euro. The European Union must continue to support Greece in order to stave off complete insolvency, but here Wolf’s premise becomes harmful. Every country in the European Union faces economic disaster if Greece’s struggles destroy the value of the Euro, and yet no country, newly prosperous Germany in particular, wants to sacrifice their own profit in order to aid an unstable nation fraught with political turmoil.

Yes, as Wolf lays out, the value of the Euro lies in the ease of currency flowing across borders. A globalized economy allows for the most efficient market, but do the risks of interdependency outweigh the benefits? Wolf would say no, but Greece’s recent failures create pause. If their economy continues to spin out of control and the country defaults on its astronomical debt, the entire European Union will feel the effect.

Furthermore, Greece is not the only country threatening the fate of the Eurozone. Like Greece, Spain’s economic situation is similarly troubling. High unemployment in the nation demonstrates a stagnated growth that threatens Spain’s market economy. Spain’s struggles in turn exacerbate the difficulty facing the EU. Just as with Greece, much of the country’s fate rests in Germany’s hands. One of the few countries facing economic gains, Angela Merkel’s nation must now decide to what extent it must support almost single-handedly those nations that have not successfully regulated their own economies.  

Economist Joseph Stiglitz speaks extensively to the dangers of globalization, highlighting the common criticism that Wolf glosses neatly over. Highly industrialized nations have benefitted greatly from globalization while leaving their less advanced contemporaries far behind. Yet in this instance it is not developed versus developing, but rather a group of developed nations. Should Germany focus on its own self-interest and increase its comparative advantage? In a short-term, nationalistic sense, the country should leave its struggling neighbor-states behind. Yet because of the interdependency promoted by globalization, the short-term benefits of establishing market dominance may lead to long-term costs across the continent.


No comments:

Post a Comment